The disagreement could be over which view they took or their understanding of the other views. The problem with this view, as Arthur F. Military officers were waterboarding known terrorists in order to gain information and when it became public, the media began reporting it as torture. And we knew far too little of our own forces and those who manned them.
Lee MacFall wrote on the Liberty. It is about time our governments realise that torture inflicts moral damage on our society, as severe as the pain felt by the people who are physically and psychologically tortured.
There is no direct right and wrong everyone has the opportunity to derive their own moral standings on things, which would then hinder the torture of someone when their moral standings could have led them to believe something different than yourself.
Reason contributor Radley Balko initially supported the torture of suspected terrorists.
To Torture or Not to Torture Note: This view would say that the ends do not always justify the means. Yes, it was horrible and inexcusable. I want to emphasize the last point because we are moral creatures, so we cannot ignore moral consequences.
As Ron Paul wrote last year on Sept. We Accept For For security reasons we do not store any credit card information.
This view would solve the question by saying we need to torture the prisoner because it is what we are supposed to do.
It did not work. Yet, justice must not go unchecked lest we ourselves become tyrants. The third view, which we will discuss, is called virtue ethics.
Your thread and reply are both due by The bible tells us to love our enemies, not to torture them.To torture or not to torture, why is this question being asked in America? The answer you will receive is different depending on who you speak to.
Proponents of torture, such as Harvard law Professor Alan Dershowitz, argued in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 that there is a need in "exceptional circumstances" to resort to "legal torture".
To Torture or Not to Torture From my reading and understanding of Holmes’ chapters and 14, I will try in my own words to explain each of the theories that were mentioned in the two questions for this discussion board%(7).
In this regard, torture can take a form of physical form or mental as well as emotional form. Torture is a painful experience on the side of the person to whom the torture is done.
The main goal is to force a person to confess and produce some vital information. In John Mcain’s essay Torture’s Terrible Toll, he argues that torture should not be used in order to retain information, while Mirko Babaric’s “A Case for Torture,” explains that torture is applicable in order to save an innocent person’s life.
To Torture or Not to Torture To torture or not to torture is an ethical dilemma for whoever is in charge of making that call.
The results may or may not seem justified to some or unjustified to others. To Torture or Not to Torture Topic: To Torture or Not to Torture Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read the Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Instructions and the following chapters from Holmes: chs.